Johnny Depp wins bid for Amber Heard phone records to prove ‘fake’ assault pics

More On:

johnny depp

Divorce docs show Johnny Depp was ‘abandoned’ by ‘mean’ mom as a teen

Amber Heard takes daughter for a stroll after Johnny Depp’s legal win

Johnny Depp makes rare red carpet appearance amid Amber Heard drama

Johnny Depp says Hollywood is ‘boycotting’ him over Amber Heard drama

A court has given Johnny Depp access to his ex-wife Amber Heard’s phone — which he hopes will prove she faked injuries he allegedly gave her.

The “Pirates of the Caribbean” star — who is waging a $50 million libel suit against Heard — claims she doctored photos purporting to show her with two black eyes, which she says she suffered in 2015 at the hands of the actor.

“Ms. Heard’s counsel has repeatedly used these phony photographs at deposition,” Depp’s lawyer Benjamin Chew alleged to the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Va., in a court filing.

Depp, 58, is suing Heard, 35, in Virginia over a 2019 op-ed in the Washington Post by the 35-year-old “Aquaman” actress, in which she wrote about domestic violence — but which he believes was a libelous attack on him.

Though she never mentioned Depp’s name in the article, Heard has elsewhere claimed that she suffered two black eyes, a broken nose and a broken lip at his hands during a 2015 attack in Los Angeles, with photos of the alleged injuries published around the world.

Chew, however, claims that when the LAPD responded to the alleged beating, “they found no injury upon Ms. Heard and no disruption to the penthouses. 

“Ms. Heard and her friends then fabricated photos that she used to obtain an ex parte TRO and a $7 million divorce settlement which Ms. Heard falsely testified in London she gave to the ACLU and, more scandalously, to the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles; sick children with cancer,” Chew alleged in his filing.

He added that the LAPD “disavowed the photographs” and “said they did not depict what they saw.”

The Virginia court ruled Wednesday that Depp’s team can have an expert look at the phone and see if they can find evidence of any photo tampering.

Chew had argued that earlier images given to Depp’s legal team came without any meta data so their expert, Brian Neumeister, could not verify the details.

“Mr. Neumeister’s preliminary investigation shows that a number of the photographs have been run through a photo — a photo editing application called Photo 3 that can easily manipulate images such as showing bruises where none actually existed,” said Chew.

In November 2020, Depp lost his libel case against the UK’s Sun newspaper over an article that called him a “wife beater”.

The judge, Mr. Justice Nicol, said The Sun had proved that what was in the article was “substantially true” and found that 12 of the 14 alleged incidents of domestic violence had occurred.

In March, Depp was refused permission to appeal against the ruling.

However, in his new Virginia court filing, Chew argued that The Sun’s own expert concluded that Heard’s photographs that showed injuries to her face from December 2015 “were manipulated three years later.”

He said the expert found that photos from iPad Pro 10.5 were created on or after 6 October 2018, adding: “As such, any editing of the trial bundle versions would have been on or after Oct. 6 2018.

“So Ms. Heard or someone on her behalf doctored those photographs three years later. When that came up in her testimony in London, Ms. Heard falsely denied it. In short, Your Honor, without forensic imaging Mr. Neumeister cannot properly assess or verify Ms. Heard’s data,” he claimed.

The court was told she appeared on James Corden’s chat show the day after the alleged attack — with Heard claiming she was wearing heavy make up to hide the bruising.

In the December 2019 op-ed at the heart of the lawsuit, Heard — who was married to the actor from 2015 to 2017 — wrote that she had “become a public figure representing domestic abuse.”

Depp’s name isn’t mentioned, but the piece was widely interpreted as being about him. The actress wrote that she “felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out.”

In response, Depp’s lawyer Adam Waldman said the column was an “abuse of the #MeToo movement” and claimed Heard “masquerades as victim rather than abuser.”

The suit claims that Depp has suffered financial losses because of the accusations, including being dropped from his role as Captain Jack Sparrow in the “Pirates of the Caribbean” films.

The judge Wednesday also denied that Depp should have to hand over his phone and laptop, saying Heard’s attorneys had asked for “too broad” a search.

In a statement, Heard’s attorney Elaine Charlson Bredehoft told us Thursday: “Amber Heard has taken proactive steps to preserve the integrity of her voluminous evidence. In fact, the Sun in the UK trial presented a forensic expert prepared to testify to the authenticity of Amber Heard’s evidence.   

“In response, to avoid expert testimony authenticating the evidence, Mr. Depp’s counsel admitted to the authenticity and therefore conceded there was no reason for expert testimony.

“Amber Heard remains willing and able to support the authenticity of her evidence, and her IT forensics expert has cooperated in this effort.  In sharp contrast, Mr. Depp has been unable to produce even the audio tapes from which he leaked a partial out-of-context portion, much less any support for the authenticity of any of his evidence.”

Share this article:

Source: Read Full Article